GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
476
c/tapering·submitted 2 years ago by u/coldchain_karen

the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Regainbranch of 13 comments

the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Regained most of it over a year and spent that year assuming it was my fault. It was not; it is what the literature describes. Stopped abruptly once and gradually once. The…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

13 comments, started 2 years ago
u/helga_vermeulen56 points·2 years ago

Is this a pause or a stop? They are different plans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coldchain_karenOPcold chain32 points·2 years ago

Correction: that study measured regain after discontinuation, not loss of effect during treatment. Very different findings.

replysharereportpermalink
u/peptidemeter_pat20 points·2 years ago

What are you planning to watch for, and over what period?

replysharereportpermalink
u/quarter_dose_queenlow and slow15 points·2 years ago

Stretched from seven days to ten to twelve over four months. Appetite told me where the limit was each time.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_ramos22 points·2 years ago

stopping abruptly and stopping gradually are different experiences

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_weiss5 points·2 years ago

Right, and the habits from the losing phase are the part that has to outlive the dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/quarter_dose_queenlow and slow2 points·2 years ago

interval stretching is the most commonly described approach here

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_baptista0 points·2 years ago

Right, and the habits from the losing phase are the part that has to outlive the dose.

adaeze_weiss is right that regain is a documented outcome rather than a character verdict.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_weiss15 points·2 years ago

the habits are what has to carry it afterwards

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_halvorsen3 points·2 years ago

Wrote down where I was before changing anything. That single page made the following six months interpretable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/helga_vermeulen22 points·2 years ago

Stopped for cost reasons. Appetite came back at about week 3, well before the scale moved, exactly as this board said it would.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic31 points·2 years ago

Withdrawal studies across this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation, with appetite typically returning before weight changes. That is a description of the pharmacology of a chronic condition.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fabio_lehtinen12 points·2 years ago

I would not treat appetite returning as a sign of doing it wrong. It is the expected sequence.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.