GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
476
c/tapering·submitted 2 years ago by u/coldchain_karen

the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Regainbranch of 7 comments

the interval stretching thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Regained most of it over a year and spent that year assuming it was my fault. It was not; it is what the literature describes. Stopped abruptly once and gradually once. The…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/pavel_halvorsen93 points·2 years ago

There is very little published guidance on stopping specifically, which is exactly why board consensus here should carry less weight than usual and a clinician conversation should carry more.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coldchain_karenOPcold chain59 points·2 years ago·edited

The habits are what carried it for a while. When they slipped, everything else followed, in that order.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_bakken-5 points·2 years ago

Careful — interval stretching and dose reduction are different interventions and your post uses them interchangeably.

replysharereportpermalink
u/taper_off_tabitha1 point·2 years ago

stopping is a plan, not an event

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo1 point·2 years ago

stopping is a plan, not an event

This is the sentence that reframes the whole board. Appetite first, scale later.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coldchain_karenOPcold chain1 point·2 years ago

Small fix — you have described interval stretching and called it a taper. The exposure profiles differ.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.