[Results] 83 weeks, 13kg, and CGM was the hard part
Update, and the title has the headline: 83 weeks, 13kg, and CGM was the hard part. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 83 weeks and 13kg. Everything below is context for those. Sensor accuracy varies across wear, and readings on the first day are the least reliable. Calibration…
Postprandial excursions typically respond earlier than fasting glucose, so the sequence people observe is not a sign that something is not working.
Identifying details redacted from the exported report above.
Assumed the weight endpoints from the obesity trials applied to my situation. They are different programmes.
This. Hypoglycaemia risk in this class is driven mostly by the other agents in the regimen.
Small fix — insulin secretion in this class is glucose-dependent, which is precisely why the risk you describe comes from the other agent.
nothing here replaces the person managing your diabetes
Agreed on variability. Two people with the same average can have completely different days.
Disagree — that is an obesity trial endpoint and this thread is about glycaemic control.