GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of what changed for me between month 5 and month 8 — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/survodutide·submitted 1 year ago by u/sena_teixeira

what changed for me between month 5 and month 8

Cautionbranch of 9 comments

what changed for me between month 5 and month 8. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. Assumed the weight numbers were the point and was corrected. They are secondary to what this is being developed for. Went slowly because everything published describes a deliberate escalation. That is…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/refund_ledger97 points·1 year ago

MASH endpoints are histological, which is a much harder bar

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theoMOD50 points·1 year ago

Removed the escalation schedule. Unapproved compound, no protocols for other members, no exceptions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_bergstrom48 points·1 year ago

Looked for independent results across this whole site and found almost none. Worth knowing before forming an opinion.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ferreira37 points·1 year ago

the hepatic data is what makes this compound different from the others

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]15 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_kuusela-32 points·1 year ago

Imaging-derived liver fat fraction is a surrogate. It correlates with histology imperfectly, and a trial reporting one is not reporting the other.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik64 points·1 year ago

Is that a weight number from a different programme?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeiraOP47 points·1 year ago

fibrosis improvement without worsening steatohepatitis is the phrase to learn

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom50 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. Imaging-based fat fraction is not the same as a histological response and the paper is explicit about that.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.