GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
5.2k
c/semaglutide·posted 1 year ago by u/alcohol_aversion

is it normal to get constipation at week 26

Meta Receipts ×1 Slow Clap ×2 Long Haul ×3

Check-in as promised in the title: is it normal to get constipation at week 26.

On the "everybody ends up at 2.4" claim, which comes up every few weeks.

The escalation schedule in the trials was designed to get people to a fixed study dose. Real use is not a trial. The dose that keeps your appetite quiet with side effects you can live with is the dose, and for a lot of people on this board that has been 1.0mg for a very long time.

The counter-argument, which is fair: some people genuinely do need the top of the range, and staying low out of caution costs them months. That is a conversation with someone who knows your history, not with us.

Steady state after a dose change takes four to five half-lives, so the fair judgement point on a new step is about a month, not four days.

If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something. Alone it is an anecdote.

5,694 up / 453 down93% upvoted18 commentsid 9ab4tq2 Aug 2024

18 comments

13 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nausea_notesMOD551 points·1 year ago

Removed the dose recommendation. You can describe what you did; you cannot tell somebody else what to take.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_stanescu430 points·1 year ago

Yes. Week 7 is when almost everybody writes the "is it still working" post, and almost everybody is fine.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rafael_ostergaard141 points·1 year ago·edited

the first four weeks are a tolerance check, not a weight-loss phase

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_nkemelu110 points·1 year ago·edited

How long was the stall before you decided it was a stall?

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence212 points·1 year ago

Do sulphur burps track the day after the shot, or is it there all week?

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_nkemelu50 points·1 year ago

2.4 is a ceiling, not a target

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
u/slow_logbook_notes493 points·1 year ago

The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug. It is a tolerability ramp, and it is why the label reads the way it does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gradient_goblin190 points·1 year ago

The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug.

Right, and the timescale is the bit that keeps getting lost. Judge a step at a month, not at a weekend.

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversionOP145 points·1 year ago

That figure is the 68-week trial mean, not a weekly rate. Dividing it by the weeks gives you a number that does not mean anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversionOP79 points·1 year ago

Small correction: 2.4mg is the maintenance ceiling on the label, not the starting maintenance dose. The distinction matters for anyone reading this later.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/semaglutide

Everything semaglutide: branded pens, compounded vials, oral formulations and the research-grade material people reconstitute themselves. Titration schedules, side-effect management, plateau troubleshooting and long-term maintenance. Dose questions are welcome; "what dose should I take" answers are not, because nobody here is your prescriber.

215kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/semaglutide rules
  1. No requests for a personal dose recommendation — describe what you did, not what someone else should do.
  2. Results posts need a timeframe and a starting point, or they get removed as unverifiable.
  3. Brand, compounded and research-grade material are all on-topic. Sourcing requests are not — that is c/vendorvetting.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.