[Question] is 96.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error
Short version of the title, which is already short: is 96.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error. Longer version underneath.
Numbers, in the order they matter: 96.2%.
STEP-1 ran 68 weeks and landed just under 15% mean body weight change on 2.4mg. It is an average of a wide distribution, not a target you have missed.
Weight change and appetite change are different endpoints on different timescales. Conflating them is where most of the confusion on this board starts.
Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug. It is a tolerability ramp, and it is why the label reads the way it does.
What dose and how many weeks at it before this started?
[deleted]
Minor fix — the half-life is about a week, not about a day. The rest of your point stands.
Strongly agree on protein. It did more for my fatigue than any of the things I bought to fix my fatigue.