compounded vs pen — anyone actually notice a difference at the same mg
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: 2.4mg matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 13 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Is that purity or net peptide content? They are not the same number.
Did anything else change in the same window? Sleep, protein, steps, anything?
Yeah, 68 weeks on 15mg, same pattern, same timing.
This is what I tell everyone in c/newbiequestions and they never believe me until week 74.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side effects.
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
my hs-CRP moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
- 1Yeah, 68 weeks on 15mg, same pattern, same timing.7 comments in this branch · started by u/arne_amankwah