[Vendor] WWB vs QST on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.5%
WWB vs QST on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.5%. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable. The relevant figures are 98.5%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Dropped my injection day by two days once because of…
The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug. It is a tolerability ramp, and it is why the label reads the way it does.
the ladder exists because the gut needs the time, not because the pharmacy likes paperwork
the ladder exists because the gut needs the time, not because the pharmacy likes paperwork
Disagree with this specific line. A pause at 1.7mg is not evidence that 1.7mg has stopped working.
Disagree with this specific line.
Adding one thing to this: the appetite effect and the scale run on separate clocks, so both halves can be true at once.
Sat at 0.5mg for four months because it was doing the job. Everyone told me to go up. The one time I did, the only thing that changed was the early fullness.
What dose and how many weeks at it before this started?
What dose and how many weeks at it before this started?
This is the part I would underline for anyone skimming. Everything else in the thread is downstream of it.
Delayed gastric emptying is most pronounced early and attenuates with continued dosing, which is why the constipation usually fades at a stable dose.
Disagree. 2.4 is the top of the label, not the goal, and "everyone ends up there" is just survivorship in the posts you read.
week 59 plateau is the most predictable thing in this entire board
week 59 plateau is the most predictable thing in this entire board
hassan_castellanos is describing the standard shape here and it matches the trial data better than most anecdotes do.