GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
0
c/scamalerts·posted 2 months ago by u/gastric_emptying_g

[Lab] 9th independent test on MKM — 97.7% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

PSA

Numbers in the title, numbers in the post. 9th independent test on MKM — 97.7% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part.

Since the title puts numbers in the shop window: 97.7% and 97.5%.

A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.

Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.

Ask me anything specific. Anything general I will probably get wrong.

0 up / 0 down41% upvoted7 commentsid r8s81d27 May 2026
Supplier named in this thread
The source page carries the verification log and every independent test a member has paid for. The storefront link is marked nofollow and sponsored; nobody here is paid for it.

7 comments

7 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/rina_bergstrom2 points·2 months ago

Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera1 point·2 months ago

Has anyone else in the thread got the same domain in their history?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting2 points·2 months ago·edited

Push back: "nobody has tested them" is a fact about this board, not a fact about the company. Say the first one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_forgery_watchMOD1 point·2 months ago

Left up. It carries dates, a domain and a document trail, which is what a report on this board looks like.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista1 point·2 months ago

the pattern repeats because it works, not because people are stupid

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_rasmussen1 point·2 months ago

a shop that will only talk off-platform has told you something

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan1 point·2 months ago

no names without evidence, that is the sidebar rule and it is a good one

replysharereportpermalink
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.