GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] QST tirz — Janoshik came back 99.5% against a claimed 99.0% — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
548
c/scamalerts·submitted 3 months ago by u/halima_boateng

[Lab] QST tirz — Janoshik came back 99.5% against a claimed 99.0%

Resolvedbranch of 10 comments

Filing this under things worth writing down: QST tirz — Janoshik came back 99.5% against a claimed 99.0%. Numbers, in the order they matter: 99.5% and 99.0%. Ask for the batch-specific certificate before payment. Any operation with a quality system behind it can produce one; the request costs you nothing and it…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 3 months ago
u/mikkel_ogunleye10 points·3 months ago

Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz7 points·3 months ago

Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda2 points·3 months ago

Asked a new shop for a batch-specific certificate before ordering. The reply was a generic catalogue page. I did not order.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferritin_low1 point·3 months ago

group buys concentrate risk in one person and nobody plans for that

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boatengOP2 points·3 months ago

Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it because one character in the domain was wrong and I paste rather than type.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (5) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.