Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the group buy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 28 comments in the full submission. View in context.

2.2k

c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/mei_cardoso

the group buy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Patternbranch of 6 comments

the group buy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. Reported something here with dates and screenshots and was asked for the document trail. Fair challenge, and it made the report worth reading. The checks I run before sending money…

Read the full submission and all 28 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago

u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution58 points·2 years ago

Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.

replysharereportpermalink

u/mei_cardosoOP34 points·2 years ago

check the domain character by character before you check anything else

replysharereportpermalink

load more comments (4) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers

95submissions

Sep 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com

More in c/scamalerts

1help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice8.8k points · 49 comments
2[Meta] proposal — a flair for fake COA posts8.1k points · 30 comments
3how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from fake COA threads7.4k points · 26 comments
4[Lab] WXT tirz — PeptideMeter came back 97.1% against a claimed 97.0%6.7k points · 40 comments
5[Discussion] can we stop arguing about fraud until somebody posts a number6.3k points · 34 comments
6does fake COA actually matter or is it forum lore at this point6k points · 41 comments

c/scamalerts rules

Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/ledger_mod u/scam_taxonomy u/coa_forgery_watch u/whois_wanda u/sock_puppet_spotter

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →