GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.8k
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/meera_sandvik

help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice

Confirmedbranch of 7 comments

help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that pushed hard for a decision the same day. Every time I see that pressure now I close the tab. Reported something here with dates and screenshots and…

Read the full submission and all 49 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/farid_kuipers742 points·2 years ago

That is an accusation about a named individual and it does not belong here in any form.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvikOP431 points·2 years ago

That is an accusation about a named individual and it does not belong here in any form.

This is the check that catches most of it, and it takes under a minute.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]198 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvikOP330 points·2 years ago

What did the storefront say the lead time was?

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo184 points·2 years ago

the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting130 points·2 years ago

Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates. That is a report. Adjectives are not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka52 points·2 years ago

That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →