the fake COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: the fake COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly. Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names. A report that says "X is a scam" is unfalsifiable and unactionable. A report that says "ordered on this date, paid this way, asked for a…
no names without evidence, that is the sidebar rule and it is a good one
Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.
Yes. The thin-evidence names in the directory are thin because nobody has anything on them, which is a different statement from a warning.
Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.
The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.
the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
Cosigning the domain check. Character by character, every time, and paste it rather than typing it.
Hunan GoodPeptides Biotech gets named here constantly and there is nothing verifiable on file either way