[Vendor] SWB vs FGP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0%
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — SWB vs FGP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0% — and a number without its method is a rumour. The relevant figures are 98.0%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because…
screenshots are not evidence, dates and documents are
The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in order, and none of them cost anything.
Domain first, character by character, pasted rather than typed. Then registration age against the claimed trading history. Then a request, in writing, for a batch-specific certificate for the lot they would ship — not the catalogue document.
Then a small order, tested independently. Only after that a real one. This sequence has cost me a handful of small orders and it has never once cost me a large one, which is the whole point.
Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.
Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates. That is a report. Adjectives are not.
Did you ask for a batch-specific document before paying?
Is this a shop, a group buy, or an individual reseller? They fail in different ways.
Went looking for independent results on Risynth Bio after seeing them named three times in a week. Found nothing verifiable in either direction.