[Lab] split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 97.9% and 98.0%
Right: split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 97.9% and 98.0%. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. The relevant figures are 97.9% and 98.0%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. The site had a decade of testimonials and…
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
What did the storefront say the lead time was?
Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names.
A report that says "X is a scam" is unfalsifiable and unactionable. A report that says "ordered on this date, paid this way, asked for a batch document on this date, received this reply, nothing since" can be checked, corroborated, or corrected by somebody with a different experience.
The second kind has repeatedly turned out to be a shipping problem, a payment window, or a misread email. The first kind never turns into anything except an argument, and when it is wrong the cost falls on somebody real.
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
Trusted Peptide gets named here constantly and there is nothing verifiable on file either way
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.