[Discussion] the cloned site advice in here is 3 years out of date
the cloned site advice in here is 3 years out of date — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested.
Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 3 years.
Went looking for independent results on Paradigm Peptide after seeing them named three times in a week. Found nothing verifiable in either direction.
Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it because one character in the domain was wrong and I paste rather than type.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty.
The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.
What is the exact domain, character for character?
Do you have anything in writing from before the payment?
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates. That is a report. Adjectives are not.
Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates.
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.
Right, and the group-buy structure is the underrated risk here. One person holds everything and there is no recourse designed in.
pressure to decide today is the oldest signal there is
What dates are we talking about — order, payment, last contact?