[Question] is 98.9% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error
is 98.9% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence.
The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 98.9%. Everything below is context for those.
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty.
screenshots are not evidence, dates and documents are
Has anyone else in the thread got the same domain in their history?
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
Adding the practical version: buy small from anyone new, test it, then decide.
a domain registered last month with a decade of testimonials is the whole tell