[Confirmed] cloned storefront, same product photos, different checkout
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/semaglutide repeats that fraud is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 14 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
This is evidence.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Batch 2 appeared on QST, Homopeptide, and QST claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
The MKM exit scam collected 22 orders and disappeared. Order ids 32 through 22 all silent.
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
- 1This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.11 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_pires
- 2reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations4 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_cardoso