GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 55 — 67 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.7k
c/retatrutide·submitted 1 months ago by u/reta_and_regret

small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 55

Trial Databranch of 8 comments

small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 55, logged the same way every week so the comparison is at least internally fair. Increases in heart rate have been reported across this receptor class. The magnitude and clinical significance are exactly what phase 3 is powered to establish. It is a triple…

Read the full submission and all 67 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 months ago
u/halima_mbeki-5 points·1 months ago

Yes — the comparison threads are apples to oranges and they generate more heat than anything else here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/discount_math_dm1 point·1 months ago

That is body weight change, not fat mass. The trials report the first and people quote it as the second.

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd1 point·1 months ago

Sceptical of the extrapolation. Forty-eight weeks does not tell you about seventy-two, and the curve shape is exactly what is unknown.

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivyMOD1 point·1 months ago

Trial names corrected in the title. The phase 3 programme and the phase 2 readout are not the same thing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira1 point·1 months ago

research-use-only material is not approved for human use, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy1 point·1 months ago·edited

research-use-only material is not approved for human use, full stop

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro1 point·1 months ago

Has anyone posted an independent test on this compound recently?

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regretOP1 point·1 months ago

Watched heart rate on a wearable across twelve weeks because the threads said to. It moved a little and I have no idea whether that means anything.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.