[Results] 8 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Six-word version is the title — 8 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — and the rest is context. Hard numbers: 8 weeks and 7.5mg. Anything softer than that is flagged as an impression. The phase 2 readout ran to 48 weeks in a few hundred participants with a slow escalation. Both the size and the…
Phase 2 estimates effect and finds a dose range. Phase 3 estimates it precisely in a bigger population and catches what phase 2 was too small to see. Treating them as the same tier of evidence is the recurring error here.
How fast was the escalation? That is usually the variable that explains the reports.
[removed by moderator]
nothing here is available as a prescription product, so read every thread with that in mind
Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.
nothing here is available as a prescription product, so read every thread with that in mind
rohan_cardoso is right about the escalation being the variable. It explains most of the difficult reports here.