is anyone tracking heart rate properly on reta or are we all guessing
Quick one. Canada here.
glucagon works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 16 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
the dosing is steep, the muscle cramps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
- 1nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring10 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_eriksen