[Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated
TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated. Change my mind, genuinely — I have no stake in being right about this. Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and that is a statement of fact rather than a disclaimer. The phase 2…
The thing that surprised me was how much of the discussion here is inference rather than measurement.
Kept a log specifically because there is so little published. It is one person and it is not data.
Right, and it bears repeating that nothing here is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.
Right, and it bears repeating that nothing here is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.
This is the sentence the rest of the board should read first. Phase 2 is not a label.
dose escalation in the trials was slow for a reason
nothing here is available as a prescription product, so read every thread with that in mind
That is body weight change, not fat mass. The trials report the first and people quote it as the second.
That is body weight change, not fat mass.
Agreed, and the glucagon arm is exactly why the comparison threads do not work.
Agreed, and the glucagon arm is exactly why the comparison threads do not work.
freya_baptista is right about the escalation being the variable. It explains most of the difficult reports here.
Has anyone posted an independent test on this compound recently?