Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.

1.1k

c/retatrutide·submitted 12 months ago by u/titration_marshal

[Question] how do you actually verify glucagon

Questionbranch of 6 comments

how do you actually verify glucagon, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion. Where the evidence actually stands, since every thread here assumes a different answer. Phase 2 reported a large mean body weight change at 48 weeks across a few hundred participants with a slow,…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 12 months ago

u/helga_vermeulen116 points·12 months ago

small trial, big effect, wide error bars

replysharereportpermalink

u/burned_once_twice83 points·12 months ago

Sent a vial to Medutest out of curiosity. Result was 98.1% against a claimed 97.5%, which is the first independent number I had seen for this compound anywhere.

replysharereportpermalink

u/cagrilintide_enthusiast29 points·12 months ago

research-use-only material is not approved for human use, full stop

replysharereportpermalink

load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers

130submissions

Sep 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

More in c/retatrutide

110 months in and dose escalation is still the thing I get wrong16k points · 40 comments
2unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about phase 2 is guesswork13k points · 33 comments
3[Lab] WXT reta — PeptideMeter came back 97.7% against a claimed 97.0%9.9k points · 52 comments
4[Results] 57 weeks, 25kg, and glucagon was the hard part8.5k points · 37 comments
5week 19 check-in — 9kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me8.3k points · 41 comments
6[Results] 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring8.3k points · 44 comments

c/retatrutide rules

Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/reta_and_regret u/trialwatch_theo u/incretin_ivy u/ledger_mod

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →