[Caution] research use only means research use only
research use only means research use only, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. The three questions to ask before ordering anything from the long tail of a catalogue. What exactly is it — catalogue number or sequence, not a common name, because several common names map to more than one molecule. How…
Net peptide content accounts for counterion, water and residual solvent. On some of these compounds the gap between purity and net content is substantial and entirely honest.
What reference standard was the assay run against?
What reference standard was the assay run against?
Agreed — and the naming problem is worse than most people here realise.
Storage conditions came back specific rather than generic when I asked. That told me somebody had actually done stability work.
catalogue depth is not the same as catalogue quality
That result is an area percent from an unspecified method, which is not the same as the identity confirmation being discussed.
That result is an area percent from an unspecified method, which is not the same as the identity confirmation being discussed.
Disagreeing with this bit: handling for one compound does not transfer to another by default.
purity methods differ between compound classes