[Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: thymosin matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 3 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
Which country?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
Stalled for 23 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 23.
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
Did anything else change in the same window?
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
supply-chain naming is a mess, ask for HPLC
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
- 1The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet…8 comments in this branch · started by u/rui_only_ro
- 2the thymosin literature is thin on humans8 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_fonseca