GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
196
c/progresspics·posted 4 months ago by u/anya_correia

someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years

Results

someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly trend is signal.

Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because composition changes are not visible on a bathroom scale.

Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.

201 up / 5 down98% upvoted23 commentsid lhoke022 Mar 2026

23 comments

14 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/rasmus_kimani34 points·4 months ago

Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_norgaard26 points·4 months ago

the clothes change before the number does

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics17 points·4 months ago

Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw5 points·4 months ago

14kg over 15 months and honestly the most useful marker was that stairs stopped being a decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_correiaOP3 points·4 months ago

Small correction, kindly meant: that is a range rather than a regain. Weight moves day to day in everybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo2 points·4 months ago·edited

Did the clothes change before the number did for you too?

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regret1 point·4 months ago

Agreed — text only was the best rule this board ever adopted. The posts are about what actually changed rather than about lighting.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]7 points·4 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker10 points·4 months ago

Why this board is text only, since new members ask every week.

A photograph invites comparison on things nobody can control — lighting, posture, where you carry weight, what you looked like before any of this. Text invites description of what changed for you: the jacket, the stairs, the measurement, the month it took.

The result is a board where the posts are about people’s actual experience rather than about images, and where nobody is competing on the wrong axis. It was a deliberate choice, it has been challenged periodically, and every time it has been kept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer-9 points·4 months ago

Nobody noticed for months. Then several people noticed in the same fortnight, which was strange and quite nice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/downvote_magnet1 point·4 months ago

Nobody noticed for months.

Adding the thing I wish someone had said to me — the goal you picked at week one was a guess.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_correiaOP6 points·4 months ago

waist is the measurement that keeps moving during a scale stall

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_diary_danalog keeper2 points·4 months ago

Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_roos9 points·4 months ago

Not convinced comparison helps here. The people posting the fastest results are the tail of a distribution, not the middle.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.