GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 — 32 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/progresspics·submitted 6 months ago by u/meera_karlsen

anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Check-in as promised in the title: anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89. On the goal weight you set in week one. You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body does at different points. Revising it is not moving the goalposts;…

Read the full submission and all 32 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 6 months ago
u/nadia_norgaard60 points·6 months ago

A goal weight chosen before starting is a prediction made with the least information you will ever have. Revising it is ordinary rather than a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/india_generic_g44 points·6 months ago

a milestone is whatever you decide it is

replysharereportpermalink
u/downvote_magnet27 points·6 months ago

Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_ostergaard27 points·6 months ago

celebrate the boring milestones, they are the durable ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_diary_danalog keeper22 points·6 months ago

celebrate the boring milestones, they are the durable ones

Slight disagreement: that is a month, not a plateau, and calling it one makes it heavier than it is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regret7 points·6 months ago

Not convinced comparison helps here. The people posting the fastest results are the tail of a distribution, not the middle.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/progresspics
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/dose_diary_danau/wholesome_lurkeru/gentle_correctionu/still_here_2026
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →