GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.6k

[Results] 12 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Results Sourced ×9 Long Haul ×2

12 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring. Numbers below. Ask me the boring questions, they are the useful ones.

Since the title puts numbers in the shop window: 12 weeks and 1.7mg.

Stalled for 13 weeks and measured my waist out of stubbornness. It had moved. The scale had not.

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

That is everything I have. The rest is opinion and I have tried to keep it out.

1,952 up / 345 down85% upvoted50 commentsid 1lkoo228 Dec 2024

50 comments

16 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/marta_marchand222 points·1 year ago

Text-only posting removes the comparison mechanism that makes image boards difficult, which is why this community adopted the rule and has kept it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin55 points·1 year ago

Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because composition changes are not visible on a bathroom scale.

replysharereportpermalink
u/units_not_mgsyringe math23 points·1 year ago

Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_wojcik-28 points·1 year ago

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly trend is signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers1 point·1 year ago

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly

Adding the thing I wish someone had said to me — the goal you picked at week one was a guess.

replysharereportpermalink
u/analog_alphabet1 point·1 year ago

The first thing I noticed was a jacket doing up. The scale had been flat for three weeks at that point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw55 points·1 year ago

goal weights chosen at week one are usually guesses

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurkerMOD157 points·1 year ago

Left up. It is a milestone post with a timeframe attached, which is all we ask.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani191 points·1 year ago

a plateau is not a failure and it is not a personality

replysharereportpermalink
u/downvote_magnet66 points·1 year ago

progress is not linear and nobody’s is

replysharereportpermalink
u/units_not_mgsyringe math47 points·1 year ago

Nobody noticed for months. Then several people noticed in the same fortnight, which was strange and quite nice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_ostergaard17 points·1 year ago

waist is the measurement that keeps moving during a scale stall

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata93 points·1 year ago

Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_gOP49 points·1 year ago

That is a waist measurement, not a weight, and the thread has been comparing them as though they were the same.

replysharereportpermalink
u/muscle_cramp_mo37 points·1 year ago

A goal weight chosen before starting is a prediction made with the least information you will ever have. Revising it is ordinary rather than a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_gOP20 points·1 year ago

Correction: 6kg over 12 months is a different claim from 6kg in a month, and the post reads as the second.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.