GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify timeframe — 31 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/progresspics·submitted 1 year ago by u/lucia_balogun

[Question] how do you actually verify timeframe

Milestonebranch of 9 comments

Genuine question, and the title is the question: how do you actually verify timeframe. Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing. Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because…

Read the full submission and all 31 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/dose_diary_danalog keeper67 points·1 year ago

the middle is the part nobody posts and everybody lives in

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin18 points·1 year ago

Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard15 points·1 year ago

Not convinced comparison helps here. The people posting the fastest results are the tail of a distribution, not the middle.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers8 points·1 year ago

Cosigning on timeframe. "45kg" means something completely different over 8 months than over one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_grimaldi2 points·1 year ago

Text-only posting removes the comparison mechanism that makes image boards difficult, which is why this community adopted the rule and has kept it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye12 points·1 year ago

16kg over 9 months and honestly the most useful marker was that stairs stopped being a decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_wojcik55 points·1 year ago

That is a waist measurement, not a weight, and the thread has been comparing them as though they were the same.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.