GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about rules until somebody posts a number — 17 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/meta·submitted 2 years ago by u/hub_ops

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about rules until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Trying to get a straight answer on this: can we stop arguing about rules until somebody posts a number. What the ranking does, in case you assume it is hiding something. The hot ordering combines the magnitude of a submission’s score with its age, so that a new post with moderate support can outrank an older one with…

Read the full submission and all 17 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/rulebook_rachaelMOD272 points·2 years ago

Reminder that no referral or affiliate links are permitted anywhere, from anybody, ever.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsOPsite staff146 points·2 years ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsOPsite staff83 points·2 years ago

Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_solberg212 points·2 years ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/stablecoin_steve-21 points·2 years ago

vendor source pages link storefronts and the link is marked

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera205 points·2 years ago

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand162 points·2 years ago

Careful — that would make individual moderation cases public by default, which is worse for the person complaining.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →