GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
257
c/meta·submitted 6 days ago by u/hamza_weiss

[Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no)

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

Quick one. Canada here. moderation works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 19 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 6 days ago
u/sterile_field_steph16 points·6 days ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki11 points·5 days ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom3 points·5 days ago·edited

the ranking formula is moderation

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic1 point·5 days ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP2 points·5 days ago

Not to be pedantic but wiki and ranking are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu10 points·5 days ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts3 points·5 days ago

Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]3 points·5 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →