GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the disclosure question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
479
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/placebo_arm_pam

the disclosure question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

the disclosure question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped arguing. Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/salma_almeida15 points·1 year ago

Vendor source pages carry an outbound link to the supplier’s own storefront, marked nofollow and sponsored, disclosed on the page and again on the funding page. Nothing is received for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_sorensen8 points·1 year ago·edited

Who does this help, and who does it cost?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_solberg6 points·1 year ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pamOP2 points·1 year ago

What is the concrete wording you would replace it with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu1 point·1 year ago

What is the concrete wording you would replace it with?

This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pamOP6 points·1 year ago

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_boateng4 points·1 year ago·edited

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one.

Adding the practical note — the formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering yourself.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →