GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
-51
c/meta·posted 1 year ago by u/ismael_varga

[Discussion] disclosure is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussion

disclosure is doing more work than we give it credit for — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested.

Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in context.

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.

Screenshot none of this. Read the whole thread, including the parts where I am told I am wrong.

146 up / 197 down43% upvoted5 commentsid a8n0mt22 Nov 2024

5 comments

5 in this archive, depth 2

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/hub_opsMOD12 points·1 year ago

Left up and flaired Proposal — it has replacement wording, which is what this board asks for.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]9 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik-26 points·1 year ago

Vendor source pages carry an outbound link to the supplier’s own storefront, marked nofollow and sponsored, disclosed on the page and again on the funding page. Nothing is received for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_nyberg1 point·1 year ago

Careful — that would make individual moderation cases public by default, which is worse for the person complaining.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom4 points·1 year ago·edited

I would not archive earlier. The old threads are the most-searched thing on the site.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →