[Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts
proposal — a flair for moderation posts. Nothing about this affects the ranking maths, before anyone asks. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor units are labelled as sponsored. Each vendor source page carries one outbound link to that supplier’s own storefront, marked…
this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier
Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide. The wording is on the rules page.
Correcting my own comment above: the proposal was adopted with an amendment, not as written.
Small fix — archiving happens at a year, not at six months. It is in the published policy.
What breaks if we make that change?
the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site
the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site
This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.
the disclosure is boring because it has to be
the disclosure is boring because it has to be
Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.
the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate
Have you taken this to modmail first?