three years of wiki threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
three years of wiki threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. I have gone back and forth on this for months. Vendor source pages carry an outbound link to the supplier’s own storefront, marked nofollow and sponsored, disclosed on the page and again on the funding page. Nothing is received for it. The…
Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail rather than in threads, because a public discussion of one person’s removal is worse for that person than a private one.
Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in context.
That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.
Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments.
This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.
sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full
Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide. The wording is on the rules page.
Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide.
kaia_fonseca is right that the strict evidence rule is the asset, not the friction.