GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify moderation — 29 comments in the full submission. View in context.
565
c/meta·submitted 4 months ago by u/enzo_petrescu

[Question] how do you actually verify moderation

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Trying to get a straight answer on this: how do you actually verify moderation. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped arguing. Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the ordering in a spreadsheet. It does what it says. Had a post…

Read the full submission and all 29 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 4 months ago
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain14 points·4 months ago

The ranking functions are published: the hot ordering combines score magnitude with age, and the controversial ordering weights total volume by the balance between up and down votes. Both are reproducible from the numbers on each submission.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_moreau0 points·4 months ago

Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy1 point·4 months ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi1 point·4 months ago

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →