unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about rules are guesswork
unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about rules are guesswork — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in…
The evidence standard on the vendor boards requires a document, a date or a named service behind any claim about a supplier. It is what makes those threads worth reading years later.
The evidence standard on the vendor boards requires a document, a date or a named service behind any claim about a supplier.
Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.
removals get explained publicly where the rule allows it
nobody here is paid, including the moderators
sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full
ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer
What would the new rule do to the vendor evidence standard?
Right, and the storefront links on source pages are marked and disclosed, which is the honest way to do it.