GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of moderation is the most under-discussed thing on this board — 8 comments in the full submission. View in context.
0
c/meta·submitted 3 months ago by u/marit_mwangi

moderation is the most under-discussed thing on this board

Metabranch of 8 comments

moderation is the most under-discussed thing on this board. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast. Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and…

Read the full submission and all 8 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 3 months ago
u/malin_petrescu-4 points·3 months ago

Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in context.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_fonseca1 point·3 months ago

nobody here is paid, including the moderators

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mwangi1 point·3 months ago

nobody here is paid, including the moderators

Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments1 point·3 months ago

Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik1 point·3 months ago

the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boateng-5 points·3 months ago

this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu1 point·3 months ago

Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide. The wording is on the rules page.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand1 point·3 months ago

evidence rules are strict here on purpose

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →