moderation is the most under-discussed thing on this board
moderation is the most under-discussed thing on this board. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down.
Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.
Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why.
Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the ordering in a spreadsheet. It does what it says.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to use it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed to new comments. That keeps a three-year-old thread from being reopened with a reply nobody will see in context.
nobody here is paid, including the moderators
nobody here is paid, including the moderators
Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.
Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.
the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site
this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier
Correction: that rule applies to the vendor boards specifically, not site-wide. The wording is on the rules page.
evidence rules are strict here on purpose
- 1Submissions older than a year are archived: readable, linkable, and closed…8 comments in this branch · started by u/malin_petrescu