GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the ranking question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 11 comments in the full submission. View in context.
57
c/meta·submitted 2 months ago by u/halima_mbeki

the ranking question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Announcementbranch of 10 comments

The title is the argument: the ranking question that gets asked weekly, answered properly. Here is the rest of it. A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text. Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail…

Read the full submission and all 11 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 months ago
u/dilara_nyberg12 points·2 months ago

The ranking functions are published: the hot ordering combines score magnitude with age, and the controversial ordering weights total volume by the balance between up and down votes. Both are reproducible from the numbers on each submission.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_ambulatoryadmin-28 points·2 months ago

Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso1 point·2 months ago

the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi1 point·2 months ago

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga1 point·2 months ago

this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchetti1 point·2 months ago·edited

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida1 point·2 months ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik1 point·2 months ago

What is the concrete wording you would replace it with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD6 points·2 months ago

Reminder that no referral or affiliate links are permitted anywhere, from anybody, ever.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·2 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.