[Question] meta — what am I missing here
meta — what am I missing here. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped…
What breaks if we make that change?
That is a complaint rather than a proposal. Bring wording and it can actually be discussed.
What breaks if we make that change?
This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.
Same view — strict evidence rules make this board slower and make the archive worth reading in three years.
That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.