GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] we crossed 800k members and nothing about the rules changes — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
585
c/meta·submitted 1 months ago by u/ahmed_cardoso

[Meta] we crossed 800k members and nothing about the rules changes

Metabranch of 6 comments

Putting this to the board: we crossed 800k members and nothing about the rules changes. What the ranking does, in case you assume it is hiding something. The hot ordering combines the magnitude of a submission’s score with its age, so that a new post with moderate support can outrank an older one with more. The…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 months ago
u/tomas_lundgren-5 points·1 months ago

Feed position is a function of early votes and time. That structurally favours agreeable early answers over correct late ones, which is why sorting by controversial occasionally is worth the effort.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_duarte0 points·1 months ago

Feed position is a function of early votes and time.

tomas_lundgren is right that the strict evidence rule is the asset, not the friction.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirre1 point·1 months ago

Right, and the storefront links on source pages are marked and disclosed, which is the honest way to do it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera1 point·1 months ago

nobody here is paid, including the moderators

replysharereportpermalink
u/stablecoin_steve1 point·1 months ago

Same view — strict evidence rules make this board slower and make the archive worth reading in three years.

replysharereportpermalink
u/malin_petrescu1 point·1 months ago

I would not archive earlier. The old threads are the most-searched thing on the site.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →