GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date — 35 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/kenji_vasquez

[Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. Hard numbers: 3 years. Anything softer than that is flagged as an impression. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped arguing. Sorted by…

Read the full submission and all 35 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/sanne_novak154 points·1 year ago

Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquezOP57 points·1 year ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga32 points·1 year ago

the wiki is editable by anybody with standing on the site

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand14 points·1 year ago

removals get explained publicly where the rule allows it

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquezOP106 points·1 year ago

Correcting my own comment above: the proposal was adopted with an amendment, not as written.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_danquah28 points·1 year ago

Cosigning on the no-links rule. It is the only reason the pricing threads are trustworthy.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]79 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_kowalski52 points·1 year ago

Right, and the storefront links on source pages are marked and disclosed, which is the honest way to do it.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.