purity — 20 things I got wrong before I got it right
Thinking out loud about this: purity — 20 things I got wrong before I got it right. Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way. If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative…
Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.
Careful with the trend claim. Four results over two years is a very sparse series to draw a line through.
the log is cumulative, that is the whole value of it
Not convinced by the comparison. Different services, different gradients, and you are treating one as ground truth.
Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?
net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
[removed by moderator]
date of analysis matters as much as the number
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.