someone explain PeptideMeter to me like I have not read a paper in years
someone explain PeptideMeter to me like I have not read a paper in years. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Sent a vial in specifically to check a supplier’s claim after a good experience. It matched. Boring result, worth logging. Tested three lots over a year rather than…
What a result posted here is actually worth, and how to make yours worth more.
A single figure with no batch identifier is about a vial nobody can locate. Add the batch and it becomes about a lot. Add the claimed figure from the certificate and it becomes a comparison. Add the service and the date and it becomes reproducible. Say that you paid for it yourself and it becomes independent.
Five extra fields, thirty seconds of typing, and the difference between a comment and a row in the log that will still be useful in three years.
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
Left up and added to the vendor source page log. Thanks for paying for it and posting it.
That reading assumes area percent and net peptide content are the same number. They are not, and the report says which it is.
Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
A series across separate lots estimates a process. Repeat tests on one lot estimate the measurement. Both are useful and they answer different questions.