GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Medutest — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right — 40 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/labresults·submitted 7 months ago by u/teodor_jansen

Medutest — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right

Labbranch of 6 comments

Medutest — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Chain of custody is why member-funded testing is worth more than a supplied certificate: the vial tested is the vial that arrived at a member’s door. WXT BPC, batch matched the paperwork, PeptideMeter…

Read the full submission and all 40 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 7 months ago
u/aurel_mwangi24 points·7 months ago

Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansenOP18 points·7 months ago

That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boateng5 points·7 months ago

Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansenOP7 points·7 months ago

Area percent or net peptide content?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulen6 points·7 months ago

one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir4 points·7 months ago

If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →