GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the Janoshik question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
483
c/labresults·submitted 7 months ago by u/anders_karlsen

the Janoshik question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Below Specbranch of 6 comments

the Janoshik question that gets asked weekly, answered properly. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. BCH BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Janoshik came back 99.6% against a claimed 99.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do. Chain of…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 7 months ago
u/piotr_nascimento46 points·7 months ago

The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_sandvik25 points·7 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by gradient and integration. Two results inside that band agree; they do not disagree quietly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe0 points·7 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by gradient and integration.

This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]17 points·7 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsenOP0 points·7 months ago

Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsenOP0 points·7 months ago

Do you have the trace, or only the summary?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →