[Below Spec] 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply
Short version of the title, which is already short: 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply. Longer version underneath. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 88%. How to build a series that means something, if you are going to spend money on testing anyway. Three tests on one lot tells you about…
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
[removed by moderator]
What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
results without method are gossip with decimals
net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting
Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.
Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?
Correcting myself: I quoted net peptide content against somebody else’s area percent. Not a comparison.
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.