[Discussion] we need a standard template or these posts are unsearchable
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 4 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have constipation I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 67 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
inter-lab variance is real, 2 points is inside normal
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
multiple batches from MKM show a spread, that is the data
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.