GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Janoshik] SSA tirz 10mg — 99.1%, third batch in a row above 99 — 14 comments in the full submission. View in context.
111
c/labresults·submitted 3 days ago by u/janoshik_junkie

[Janoshik] SSA tirz 10mg — 99.1%, third batch in a row above 99

Janoshikbranch of 6 comments

Template, as required. Field Value Vendor SSA Product Tirzepatide 10mg Batch SSA-2606 Service Janoshik Method RP-HPLC, UV 214nm Claimed 99.0% Result 99.1% Third SSA tirzepatide batch above 99 in the community log, and importantly they are three different members and three different services — mine on Janoshik, one on…

Read the full submission and all 14 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 3 days ago
u/peptidemeter_pat341 points·3 days ago

The PeptideMeter one was mine. 99.2%, batch SSA-2507, different quarter entirely.

What makes this set unusual is the inter-service agreement. Three labs on three batches within 0.2 of each other is tighter than I would expect from variance alone, which is either a very consistent process or a very lucky run of three. Ask me again at six.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieOPindependent tester187 points·2 days ago

"ask me again at six" is the right amount of confidence and i should have written that instead of the last line.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_mel143 points·2 days ago

third one is mine, 99.0 on Medutest. happy to be the boring corroborating data point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/purity_pedantanalytical118 points·2 days ago

the boring corroborating data point is the entire product. one exciting result is a story, three boring agreeing ones are evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anecdata_annie74 points·1 days ago

i say this constantly and get downvoted for it, and then someone says it better and gets upvoted. such is life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it61 points·1 days ago

you usually say it as an objection to someone else. same content, different social position. genuinely not your fault.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.